Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 91 FR 12516

  • From: Damonte Alexander
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 116506
    Date: 4/30/2026

    Comment Text:

    Dear Chairman and Commissioners,


    My name is Damonte Alexander, and I'm a student from Maryland writing to share my thoughts on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Prediction Markets, as published in 91 FR 12516. I'll be honest, I'm not entirely sure about all the details of the changes being proposed, but Ive used prediction markets a few times and believe theyre valuable. I wanted to weigh in because I think its important that regular people like me have the freedom to participate in legal, regulated markets without unnecessary restrictions.


    As a student, Ive found prediction markets to be a unique way to engage with real-world events. Ive placed a few small trades on platforms that predict election outcomes or economic indicators, and its been eye-opening to see how these markets often get closer to the truth than polls or news pundits. Its not just about making a few bucks. Its about learning and having a stake in understanding whats happening around me. I worry that if these markets get banned or over-regulated, that opportunity slips away for people like me who arent big investors or insiders.


    I understand there are concerns about manipulation or insider trading, and those are real issues. But I dont think the answer is to put heavy restrictions or broad bans on prediction markets. If you make it too hard to participate legally, people will just turn to unregulated offshore platforms where theres no oversight at all. That seems way riskier to me. Instead, I think the CFTC should focus on targeted rules that address specific problems, like cracking down on bad actors, while still letting regular folks participate in a safe, regulated space. I noticed in your questions, especially around numbers 7 through 14 on public interest, youre asking how to balance innovation and protection. I think proportionate regulation is the way to go, not shutting things down.


    I also saw questions 15 to 22 about what kinds of activities should be allowed. I believe as long as these markets are transparent and regulated, they shouldnt be treated like gambling. Theyre more like a tool for learning and forecasting, at least in my experience as a student trying to make sense of complex issues.


    Im asking you to support rules that keep prediction markets accessible to everyday people while focusing on smart, specific regulations to handle the risks. Dont let broad bans or over-restrictions push this activity out of sight to less safe places. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts.


    Sincerely,

    Damonte Alexander

Edit
No records to display.