Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 91 FR 12516

  • From: Alexander C Garner
    Organization(s):
    Concerned citizen

    Comment No: 115032
    Date: 4/22/2026

    Comment Text:

    Dear Mr. Selig and other esteemed members of the review board;

    I write to you today as a concerned member of the citizenry. I'm well aware that irony is lost on you, but you must at least admit that a rose by any other name is still a rose, and to pretend that what these platforms do is anything but enable gambling, then you are perpetuating a marketing lie that will ruin the populace for years. I don't know how much they're paying you, but what number is the right number?

    I don't think the service they provide is particularly useful, but I don't think that they should be shut down either. They simply shouldn't be allowed to lie about themselves for profit. If I did that, you'd call me a fraud and prosecute me.

    Please, do the right thing. Also, uhm... I just want to add here the words Bitcoin, Ethereum, blockchain, staking and web3 to make sure we get those in before the end of the comment period.

    Thank you.

Edit
No records to display.